Skip to content

Utility-scale roundup: The days of big solar projects in the US are back

Share

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Popular content

California installs 10 GW of utility-scale batteries
11 October 2024 CAISO set a new peak battery discharge record of 8.3 GW on October 9, as the state’s future EIA energy storage queue holds 177 GW of capacity, with 1...

Share

2 comments

  1. “These large solar projects are no longer driven by RPS edicts but by corporate buyers and the sheer competitive pricing of solar or solar-plus-storage compared to other generation sources.”

    This is the trend since the mega to gigawatt solar PV projects floated in the 2003 to 2007 time frame. The problem, way too much power generation during the solar PV peak generation portion of the day and no place to sell it. Curtailment of a non-fueled generation asset is wasteful and inefficient. Now smaller projects with energy storage as part of the project, creates one project with many stacked grid service applications and multiple revenue streams from one asset. It didn’t make sense to electric utilities to sign a 25 year PPA on a 500MW solar PV farm and have to “curtail” the plants output or pay another State to take the excess generation and pay ‘them’ to take the excess. Now, smaller projects, 100MWp and energy storage could be used for grid regulation, storage of excess solar PV generation during the day and use of this energy in the evening hours to service grid demands. Sooner or later the utility will figure out solar PV farm, save most of the daily generation into a large energy storage facility and use time shifted daytime non-fueled generation to service the grid at night time. The distribution of these “smaller” projects with energy storage can become the new normal generation and use electricity market.

  2. I am so glad to see solar grow. Wind farm on land are a menace in my opinion. They secretly invade a region, have land owners sign non disclosure agreements, divide a community and then won’t put up money to dismantle the turbines after the 20 year lifespan is over! We fought this in the northern Adirondack town of Parishville and Hopkinton, so far.
    Go safe quiet low to ground solar. Only drawback is takes away production of crops and hay fields.

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.

Welcome to pv magazine USA. This site uses cookies. Read our policy.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close