Across all market segments, PV system costs are falling faster than anticipated, according to new research from Wood Mackenzie. The unexpected fall in costs has been attributed to the rapidly declining price of modules, with the costs of a residential system using mono PERC modules now expected to fall 17% from 2020 to 2025, while mono PERC commercial and utility system costs are expected to decline 16% and 20% respectively over the same time.
Another development is brewing in the utility-scale segment, where bifacial mono PERC modules on tracking systems are becoming more and more cost-competitive with monofacial mono PERC modules. While bifacial tracking systems drive up costs with their increased inter-row spacing, requiring more land and larger project footprints, these same projects also offer reduced balance of system components and lower labor costs due to less system components.
Most important for bifacial utility tracking projects has been their exception from the Section 201 tariffs — so far. Because of this exemption, bifacial system costs are expected to sit at around 1% less than monofacial mono PERC systems over that same 2020 to 2025 timeframe. Without it, these projects have a much higher cost than their monofacial mono PERC counterparts.
Customer acquisition is still expensive
For residential projects, falling module prices can only bring down costs so much. For years, the bane of residential solar system pricing has been the soft costs of customer acquisition, permitting and inspection. For some residential solar companies, customer acquisition alone can represent up to 30% of the per-watt cost the company incurs for each new system installed.
Sunrun, the largest residential solar company in the United States, has a creation cost of $3.09/watt of solar that the company installs, as of Q1 2020. And while the bulk of this figure comes from the cost of installation ($2.39), $0.76 comes from sales and marketing.
According to WoodMac, soft costs are going to be the biggest barrier for continued system pricing decreases moving forward. After the significant fall that module prices are expected to take in the first half of this decade, those decreases will slow substantially after 2025.
While customer acquisition has proved to be difficult to drive down, WoodMac did take time to recognize Solar Foundation and NREL, as the two have collaborated to form The Solar Automated Permit Processing platform, which could help drive down some of those persistent permitting costs.
Covid affecting costs
And, since no news can exist without a Covid angle, WoodMac shares that residential system prices will be impacted more than any other market segment in 2020. The researchers expect the virus to have very little impact on commercial and utility-scale project costs. In fact, Molly Cox, an analyst for WoodMac shares that, as module manufacturers face reduced demand, they’re lowering margins to stay competitive.
WoodMac predicts that the price per-MW-generated for a 10 MW project to be almost 8% lower than pre-Covid estimations.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
As fixed evolved to single-axis, so shall single-axis evolve to dual-axis tracking.
J#
It is commendable to see the massive effort put into reducing $/W of Solar Panels…. specifically the cells themselves…. that actually do ALL THE WORK of producing the electrons aka Electrical Energy.
Unfortunately…. even if Solar Cells were “free”… or $0/W…. the overall Cost of the PV System would barely be affected.
The article suggests Sunrun has a “creation cost” of $3.09/W for Residential Projects and $0.72/Watt is for Sales/Marketing. Possibly another $1.70/W for Inverters, Installation, etc… 0.30/W Profit leaving $0.37/W for the Solar Panels…. and possibly $0.20/W or less for the Cells themselves.
Thetefore…. if the cells were free; Sunrun’s “creation cost” would still be $2.89/W… about 6.5% less.
It is clear from the above that more “R&D” (???) needs to be focussed on the “other” parasitic costs…. and that includes Overheads…. Marketing, Sales, Profits, Installation Hardware, Labor, Inverter/Power Processing Costs etc.. to provide greater reduction in PV System Costs…. at least for the Residential Market.
I hope pvmagazine will report more on New and Innovative Solutions to reduce PV SYSTEM Costs, further, as the “Cell Guys” are doing and leading “the charge” for more affordable Residential (and other) Solar Systems.
This would all be true if Tesla hadn’t fired all their salespeople, moved to online sales with set pricing, and recently pushed pricing below $2/W. Their service isn’t great, but they’re not gonna budge on pricing and will soon force the entire market to adapt. It’s gonna be an ugly 2 years, we’ll be much better off on the other side.