BREAKING: Court approves Sungevity sale to Northern Pacific

The bankruptcy court's approval of Sungevity's assets to Northern Pacific Group brings to an end a rough quarter for the formerly Top 4 residential solar installation firm.

Sungevity’s sudden and startling fall from grace came to a quiet end yesterday after a Delaware bankruptcy court approved the sale of its assets to Northern Pacific Group for $50 million.

The judge’s order does preserve two objections in their entirety from Oracle America and Sol Systems, objections that will be heard separately by the court on May 2.

In its initial filings, Sungevity reported its assets and liabilities as being somewhere between $100 million to $500 million. The asset sale to Northern Pacific will allow the company to invest $20 million in the company immediately.

Only 34 days after it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, bounced employees’ final paychecks and became the subject of a class-action lawsuit seeking money for accrued vacation pay (among other violations of federal law), the approved sale of the company’s assets brings to a close a quarter the company’s executives would like to forget.

A Top 5 residential solar installer as recently as last year, Sungevity’s fortunes started to dim rapidly in January, when a proposed “reverse-merger” with investment firm Easterly Acquisition Corp. collapsed, closing the door on the company’s hopes to access public capital for somewhere between $357 million and $607 million.

The transaction was supposed to provide Sungevity the money it needed to compete with SolarCity, Sunrun and Vivint Solar, but the deal failed to move forward under mysterious circumstances, with no explanation from Easterly about why it pulled out of the deal.

On March 9, reports emerged that the company had laid off 400 employees in its Missouri and California offices, with rubber paychecks hitting the bank accounts of its employees. Four days later, the company declared bankruptcy and, in what certainly felt like the final death blow, former employees sued the company alleging it broke federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act provisions by not providing at least 60 days notice to its employees before the March 9 cuts.