David Roberts (@drvox) asked Twitter for its “Dream Biden/Harris cabinet” for the U.S. State, Defense, Treasury, EPA and Energy departments. Twitter, the brilliant and wrong social network, then weighed-in on who Joe Biden, the Democrat candidate for president, should choose as the 16th U.S. Secretary of Energy — managing the country’s nuclear weapons program, its energy labs and its energy programs.
Twitter provided data and our statistically flawed and subjective study attempted to parse the responses, confining itself to the more serious answers — and just the DOE secretary position.
Everyone is a comedian
Nick Fury, Tony Stark, Scrooge McDuck and Captain Planet are not serious choices, Jigar. Although Nick Fury and Captain Planet, in their current fictional incarnations, are the only Black nominees in this entire make-believe exercise.
Keef, Mick, Woodie, Charlie and Bill are not going to be in the Biden Cabinet. The Bidens are more of an Al Green, Frank Sinatra, Bruce Springsteen family.
Bruce Dickinson, Dave Murray, Adrian Smith, Steve Harris and Nicko McBrain are also not going to be a part of the cabinet (Tammy Duckworth was more of a Twitter favorite for Defense than Bruce.)
Here’s the breakdown on the Twitter responses.
Fantasy cabinet member long-shots: Elon Musk, Martin Heinrich, David Hochschild, Beto O’Rourke, Jigar Shah, Corey Booker, Ken Caldeira, Saul Griffith, Ed Markey, Sonia Aggarwal, Hal Harvey, Daniel Kammen, Sandra Steingraber, Ari Peskoe, Steve Chu, Jacky Rosen, Jennifer Granholm, Lawrence Krauss, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, David Roberts, Jan Mazurek, Bill Foster, Susan Tierney, Anne Pramaggiore, Brian Schatz and Fred Krupp.
Dark and very dark horses: Ernest Moniz, Andrew Yang, Sean Casten, Bill McKibben, AOC, Rex Tillerson, Amy Klobuchar, Al Gore, Tom Steyer and Jason Bordoff.
Clear crowd favorite: Washington Governor Jay Inslee was the runaway leading response. Inslee served as the governor of the state since 2013 and has emphasized climate change as one of his primary focuses. Here’s Inslee’s clean energy manifesto, developed over his career and honed on his recent curtailed presidential campaign.
Inslee also got substantial support on Twitter as potential head of the EPA.
The Progressive Cabinet Project notes, “Inslee ran an issue-focused campaign prioritizing climate policy, arguably the first of its kind on the national stage, that raised the governor’s profile and has led to speculation that he will be considered for a role in a future administration,” adding, “Should Democrats control the Senate, Inslee would likely have very little trouble being confirmed for the position.”
Other Twitter takeaways
Perhaps more insightful than Twitter’s choice of DOE Secretary is its take on the job and the cabinet itself. A large number of tweets asked for the creation of a cabinet-level climate czar and the elevation of the EPA to cabinet department. Other tweets called for breaking up the DOE into a sub-cabinet-level nuclear weapons and stockpile agency and a cabinet-level agency dedicated to the low-carbon energy transition.
David Roberts, the instigator of this contest, received one fantasy nomination for the head of the DOE, but declined, saying, “I am extremely unqualified to manage the nation’s stockpile of nuclear weapons, which is most of what DOE does, sadly.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.