According to a recent study, published in Nature Energy and led by researchers at Stanford University, commercial and industrial rooftop offer a great opportunity to reduce what researchers call the “solar equity gap.”
The gap exists because lower-income communities have historically been slower to adopt solar power than their affluent neighbors, even when local and federal agencies offer tax breaks and other financial incentives.
“The solar equity gap is a serious problem in disadvantaged communities, in part because of income inequalities, but also because residential solar isn’t usually practical for people who don’t own their homes,” said Ram Rajagopal, senior author of the study and associate professor of civil and environmental engineering and of electrical engineering at Stanford. “This new study shows that commercial and industrial properties have the capacity to host solar resources to fill in part of that gap.”
The researchers used satellite images and artificial intelligence to identify the number and size of rooftop solar arrays in 72,739 census tracts across the U.S., with about one-third of those tracts identified disadvantaged by the U.S. government.
The team tracked the amount of unused rooftops with good solar potential, then calculated the average annual cost of producing solar electricity in each area, based on the amount of local sun exposure and other variables. The costs ranged from about 6.4 cents per kWh in sun-drenched New Mexico to almost 11 cents in Alaska. Compare this to the 2022 electricity rate that was just over 20 cents per kWh in Alaska and about 10 cents in New Mexico, per Energy Information Administration data. The researchers noted that there would be additional costs of getting the power to residential areas as well as other costs, such as battery storage and the construction of microgrids.
“We estimate that battery storage would increase total system costs by about 50%, but even that would be practical in almost two-thirds of the disadvantaged communities we studied,” said Chad Zanocco, co-author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow in civil and environmental engineering.
The untapped rooftops offer great potential for community solar installations, which low-income residents could subscribe to. Community solar is a way for people to access solar energy who don’t own their own home or can’t afford the up-front cost of solar. Furthermore, the Inflation Reduction Act offers a bonus tax adder for community solar developers who build community solar projects in disadvantaged communities and have low-income subscribers.
“Beyond reducing carbon emissions and slowing climate change, increased access to solar power would offer tangible local benefits to lower-income communities,” said Zhecheng Wang, a co-author and a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. “This would promote local clean and low-cost energy generation, which would also increase the resilience from outages and reduce the pollution caused by fossil fuel power plants – many of which are located in low-income areas.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
How can one get a copy of Dr. Zhecheng Wang’s paper? We are a EPC startup in Texas and are very interested in Community Solar as a solution to the solar equity gap.
How can one get a copy of Dr. Zhecheng Wang’s paper? We are a EPC startup in Texas and are very interested in Community Solar as a solution to the solar equity gap.
Note: this is a duplicate message. I also sent it from albert.vigil@gimail.com
WHO WILL PAY? Utilities, utility rate payers or taxpayers. So far, only the ratepayers have paid and the owners of the properties with hopes of getting a return for their money. Owners will have the utilities change the rate plans and add fixed charges to nullify the owner’s savings and return like NEM3.0 and fixed charge increases in California. Government programs are funded by taxpayers and have so much pork, the taxes will go on forever. Utilities leasing the rooftops and selling the electricity for profit is the only way forward to pay for the rooftop expansion and have owners getting any real payback, although fixed and for long term leases. Utilities pay for the system and maintain it along with the roof itself and control its energy distribution. Forget the poor and disadvantaged in this TIC-TOK world. Money talks and the idealists walk.
The ideas are good! Now there is some idea of FusionSolar, may you consider it in developing traditional solar?
LMI, what does this stand for?