On December 19, 2022, the U.S. Department of Commerce released clarification that its recent, nuanced ruling only applies to companies that are manufacturing solar modules in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. The opinion was found in a memorandum titled “Clarification of Product Coverage” in reference to Docket Number A-570-979.
The request for clarification, initiated by Maxeon Solar, applies to all businesses based outside of these four countries, including those that use solar wafers and cells originating in China. In short, the clarification reaffirms that companies manufacturing solar panels outside of the four southeast Asian countries were not analyzed in the Department of Commerce’s original ruling, and are not affected by the initial anticircumvention ruling.
The opinion was sought, in part, because companies that were not specifically named in the original ruling, or those that did not provide information to the Department of Commerce during the research period, were looking for explicit answers as to their status. Some companies that had failed to provide information had been given an “adverse facts’ determination, which carries a very high – business killing – import tariff.
Maxeon is a public company with offices around the world. They’ve announced new US capacity, and are currently manufacturing panels in Mexico. They recently won a deal to deliver nearly 1 GW of modules to the Gemini Solar Project.
The Department of Commerce reiterated from their original ruling:
“These circumvention inquiries cover certain solar cells and modules that have been completed in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, or Vietnam, using parts and components from China, as specified below, that are then subsequently exported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, or Vietnam to the United States (inquiry merchandise).”
The document makes it clear that this ruling is specifically focused on solar modules manufactured in these four countries. However, the Department of Commerce notes that the broader, original case from 2012 includes all solar cells made from Chinese solar wafers. That case is still in effect.
One could have expected the Department of Commerce’s clarification to be circumspect, since its initial ruling was very specific.
The department’s ruling on subcomponents seems to have somewhat shifted in its policy, allowing for the import of a new non-tariffed product class. This new class is, apparently, modules built using China-origin solar cells, assembled with at least three subcomponents originating from outside of China. The list of subcomponents includes silver paste, aluminum frames, glass, backsheets, ethylene vinyl acetate sheets, and junction boxes.
This article was amended on 12/22/22 to correctthat statement that Maxeon is primarily Chinese owned.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
John, could you please post a hyperlink to the Commerce clarification doc? Having trouble finding it via their website. Happy Merry!
Hey Tom, no hyperlink because document came to me other channels and I couldn’t find it on their website either. Check your inbox though.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.