SEIA and Wood Mackenzie issued a call to the federal legislature to move quickly to pass climate and clean energy policy. The US solar industry is facing supply chain challenges, trade actions, and legislative uncertainty. Wood Mackenzie said prices have increased as much as 18%, slowing deployment.
As much as a third of all utility-scale solar capacity scheduled to activate in Q4 2021 was delayed by at least a quarter, and 13% of projects planned for 2022 will be delayed for a at least a year, or have been cancelled altogether, according to SEIA and Wood Mackenzie. These pressures have led Wood Mac to lower its near-term solar forecasts by 19%, or 11GW.
Without significant policy support, including a long-term extension of the federal investment tax credit (ITC), Wood Mac said the US may only achieve 39% of its target of a carbon-free power sector by 2035.
After multiple rounds of slashing the total cost of the Build Back Better bill, US senators remain locked in negotiations. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) voted against an earlier proposal, shocking many, and has now said he will reopen negotiations “starting from scratch.” For now, the nation awaits resolution in what would be the most significant climate and energy legislation in US history.
“In the face of global supply uncertainty, we must ramp up clean energy production and eliminate our reliance on hostile nations for our energy needs. Policymakers have the answers right in front of them: if we pass a long-term extension of the solar Investment Tax Credit and invest in U.S. manufacturing, solar installations will increase by 66% over the next decade, and our nation will be safer because of it. America’s energy independence relies on our ability to deploy solar, and the opportunity before us has never been more obvious or urgent.” SEIA CEO and president Abigail Ross Hopper
Ten-year forecasts from Wood Mackenzie show that passing a long-term extension of the ITC, manufacturing tax credits, and other key clean energy incentives could increase installations by 66%. The group estimates an additional 20GW of US manufacturing would be added with supportive policy. Earlier proposals of the Build Back Better Act contained significant incentives for solar modules, trackers, inverters, and more.
In an interview with pv magazine, module producer Maxeon said that it is considering a 3GW cell production plant in the US, but is waiting on a Title XVII loan from the Department of Energy, and the passing of Sen. Jon Ossoff’s (D-GA) Solar Energy Manufacturing for America Act. If passed, the company said it could begin producing cells in the US as soon as 2023.
Wood Mackenzie estimates 10-year growth under a long term ITC would be 86% for utility-scale solar, 20% for residential solar, and 15% for commercial/community and other non-residential solar. Solar capacity additions could exceed 70GW by 2030 under this growth projection.
“The supply chain constraints of the last year will hit 2022 installations the hardest, reducing capacity by 7% compared to 2021,” “But our forecasts demonstrate long-term growth will overshadow these short-term challenges, especially if federal clean energy incentives are passed. In our ITC extension scenario, installed solar capacity is expected to multiply six times by 2032.” Michelle Davis, principal analyst at Wood Mackenzie
Despite uncertainty in policies like net energy metering (NEM), and the headwinds affecting all solar sectors, residential solar grew 30% year over year, reaching nearly 24GW of new installed solar capacity. California, which represents half of the nation’s rooftop solar market, is awaiting results on a reworked NEM 3.0. Earlier proposals of NEM 3.0 slashed solar value aggressively enough to cause Wood Mackenzie to drop its deployment projections in half for the state. The decision has been delayed indefinitely, thanks to advocacy efforts by groups like SEIA and the protest of thousands of Californians.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
The Build Back Better Act according to the web is about 2200 pages long. If we are really serious about solar, wind and water powering the United States then what needs to happen is that portion needs to be broken out as a severate Act/Bill.
If that portion that deals with solar, wind and water are broken out into a seperate Act/Bill then in my opinion it would most likely be approved. However, lumping it in with all of the other stuff contained in those 2200 pages is a serious restraint to its approval.
“what needs to happen is that portion needs to be broken out as a severate Act/Bill.”
Under normal circumstances to pass a bill they need 60 votes for cloture (assuming Republican filibuster, which if Democrats are associated, is the expected reaction).
The BBB bill was a budget reconciliation bill though which only needed a simple majority to pass. But one Democratic senator, Joe Manchin, was against, so the bill failed.
So yes, it can be harder to pass a big bill than a smaller bill, all else being equal. But because of the filibuster and only one bite at the reconciliation apple per fiscal year, all things are not equal.
Also sometimes “logrolling” two things together actually makes the whole easier to pass, not harder because key senators are getting things they want even if someone else gets something they want too.
So you either need small bipartisan bills, and bipartisan meaning at least 10 Republican senators like happened with the Infrastructure bill. Or you need a combo reconciliation bill that Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema are on board for the scope.
All other Democrats will generally go along with whatever they can get if Machin and Sinema don’t ask for any poison pills. But if they’re ACTUALLY on board, there won’t be any.
Excellent response John and I certainly appreciate it. The only comment I have is that more conservative Republicans might be in favor of a more trimmed down bipartisan bill than some Democrats expect. Big hefty legislative bills which add to our national debt are difficult for Republicans to swallow; at least those that are not too far to the right, ha ha.
I know here in the Southwest where I wrote some of the papers which helped our local Mayor obtain State funding for part of our solar system on the cities administrative offices jumped on the bandwagon when the focus was sharpened. And our Mayor was a right leaning Republican so just maybe …
It is my hope that everyone remembers the phrase I wrote some 15 years ago. “All we need is clean air to breathe and water to drink for everyone on this planet”. The path we take to get there however is very wide and contains many different turnoff. Again thank you for the professional response. Have a great day.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.