The Southern California Gas Company announced a plan to develop the nation’s largest green hydrogen energy infrastructure system – the “Angeles Link” – which would deliver green hydrogen to the Los Angeles Basin region. Southern California Gas will submit the first phase of its plans to the California Public Utilities Commission today.
While the technical details describing the proposed facility are scant, the company teased us with a few of their broader, auspicious goals:
- Enough fuel to convert four natural gas power plants to green hydrogen
- Displace up to 3 million gallons of diesel fuel per day
- Eliminate nearly 25,000 tons of NOx per year
- Equivalent to nearly 25% of the natural gas delivered by the company
The green hydrogen is to be produced by electrolyzers, which are powered with renewable energy. Each of the company’s social media pages posted about green hydrogen yesterday. The company also tweeted an article containing the following schematic, which describes what the system might look like:
At the moment, the largest hydrogen electrolyzer in the world is Baofeng Energy’s 150 MW facility in China. But larger facilities are already under construction, and there has been a bevy of newly announced hydrogen electrolyzers recently, especially from Australia.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicts that electrolyzer installations in 2022 will quadruple those of last year.
The gas company, along with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Mitsubishi Power, and others, is part of an organization that seeks to deliver green hydrogen to the Los Angeles basin at $1.50/kilogram by 2030.
Southern California Gas launched the first power to gas hydrogen demonstration project in the US in 2015. The company currently has 10 hydrogen pilot projects ‘in motion’.
Perhaps by coincidence, (or not), the U.S. Department of Energy announced two Requests for Information yesterday, for the planning, design, and implementation of the “Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s Regional Hydrogen Hub” and the “Electrolysis and Clean Hydrogen Manufacturing and Recycling Programs.” The goals of these programs include ramping up technology in the sector to assist the industry in reaching a cost of $1/kilogram for hydrogen by 2032.
The company seeks to make use of 25-35GW of curtailed and new wind and solar power, plus two gigawatts of energy storage. The electrolyzer facility will range from 10 to 20GW of capacity and will require 200 to 750 miles of hydrogen infrastructure.
Application to PUC for the Angeles Link project.
pv magazine USA updated this article on Feb. 18, 2022 with the link to the application to the PUC.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
$1.50/kg would be fantastic if they could do it since 1 kg of hydrogen has the energy equivalent of about 1 gallon of gasoline. I wonder if it can really be stored underground without losing a lot of it over time.
Power generation through Green Hydrogen would be a great initiative by Southern California gas company .
What will be ultimate cost of power generation ?
No, power generation through hydrogen is generally STUPID, just directly use the electricity the electrolyzers would require to follow water instead of making the inefficient expensive detour through hydrogen.
The last diagram in the article “How Does it Work” lists “dispatchable energy generation as one use for the green hydrogen, and the tie-up with Mitsubishi suggests burning the hydrogen in inefficient thermal generators instead of dirty natural gas. That will have a hard time competing with batteries for short duration energy supply. Maybe if Southern California Gas (note It’s not an electric utility, so already biased) can find some existing enormous salt dome or other underground cavern to store hydrogen for long periods.
Battery technology will continue advancing, continually dropping the price. But elecrolyzing water to make hydrogen appears to be much less likely to get more efficient or less costly. It certainly makes no sense for automobiles, even at today’s lithium battery prices. But maybe for awhile, until utility scale batteries become cheap enough, it might makes sense to use solar electric derived hydrogen in place of natural gas – I’m not sure – maybe utility scale batteries are already better in that case right now.