Kentucky joined the nearly half-dozen states currently mulling legislation designed to destroy nascent solar industries in their states in what is rapidly becoming a mind-numbingly familiar story.
Following the leads of states like Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Texas, Arizona and Maine, Kentucky State Senator Jared Carpenter has introduced Senate Bill (SB) 214, a bill the sponsor insists is designed to bring stability to the solar market and protect non-solar ratepayers from cost shifts that exist only in the minds of utility executives who see their profits eroding as solar’s popularity grows.
In reality, the bill sets new restrictions on solar customers’ ability to recover system costs through net-metering and gives utilities an unfettered right to treat solar customers as a separate rate class. Specifically, the legislation would enshrine in law the utilities’ right to charge solar customers demand and fixed charges and allow those charges to bear no relation to the rates charged non-solar customers.
The bill would also allow each utility to argue for a different net-metering rate in separate rate cases instead of having a uniform rate statewide. Industry advocates say the resulting payback-calculation chaos would likely cause customers to decide against investing in a rooftop solar system, bringing the state’s market to a screeching halt.
Carpenter did learn at least one lesson from watching these battles play out in other states, however: The legislation contains provisions to grandfather current customers under existing rules, as long as the system is installed by July 15.
Other states, most notably Nevada, did not include such a provision in their net-metering decisions, leading to contentious public fights and outrage by solar installers and customers alike.
Nevada has since reversed its decision and grandfathered current customers in under current rules, but the state’s solar industry is still recovering from the fallout of the original decision.
Kentucky’s bill is currently in the Natural Resources and Energy subcommittee.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
I strongly opposed the Senate House Bill 214 (KRS 278.465 through 468 that has been proposed and introduced to the Kentucky legislature by Mr. Jared Carpenter (why on earth would he be in favor of such a bill???)! This bill violates the citizens of Kentucky rights as consumers of electricity and producers of renewable energy.
I find it very surprising that the Kentucky legislature would introduce a bill that:
1) Kills jobs in one of the fastest growing employment sectors in the country
2) Halts free enterprise and energy independence in favor of monopoly interests
3) Protects profits for out-of-state interests by treading on the rights of Kentuckians
This bill does not help Kentuckians, and only benefits big corporations to monopolize the energy production in the State (and across our Nation). For years, the power companies have opposed Solar Energy Production as efficient energy source! But wait, the very same energy companies (i.e. LG&E, EKPC, etc) now want to control this industry themselves by creating a “Community Solar Tariff” on consumers by constructing their own Solar Energy Plants (see February, 2017 issue of Kentucky Living, pages 26A and 26B), and provide less incentive to the consumer to have their own to limit their energy costs.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.