When the Indiana Senate’s Committee on Utilities voted to pass along Senate Bill (SB) 309 to the full Senate last week on a vote of 8-2 they had to expect blowback from solar advocates. After all, critics say the bill will essentially end net-metering in the state precipitously.
This morning, hellfire rained down on committee chair Sen. Jim Merritt in the form a blistering letter from the Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance (IDEA), which accused bill sponsor Sen. Brandt Hershman of making statements that were “simply not true” to obscure his real intent.
“In fact, some of [Hershman’s] misstatements are so egregious we think they may have unfairly influenced Thursday’s committee vote,” the letter read. “For this reason, we strongly urge the committee not to move forward on its report on SB 309 until these errors can be rectified. We also believe committee members should have a chance to change their vote after they receive the correct information.”
The letter was signed by the organization’s president, Laura Ann Arnold.
Among the misstatements IDEA accuses Hershman of making are that net-metering goes away when utilities hit 1% of their baseload generation under current Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission rules. IDEA also says Hershman lied when he said that if the 1% net metering caps were met the utilities could go to a “buy all, sell all” mechanism under existing law.
As pv magazine reported last month, SB 309 is a fascinating Trojan horse of a bill, which purports to support solar while enacting policies that would damage the state’s rooftop solar industry – particularly the residential sector – immediately.
The bill as introduced moved solar power from net metering to a “sell all, buy all” system, meaning that homeowners with solar on their rooftops wouldn’t be allowed to use the electricity they produce themselves and would have to sell all their electricity to the utility at a lower, wholesale rate. Then the homeowners would be required to buy all their electricity back from the utility at the higher retail rate. The bill also allows utilities to stop providing net-metering incentives as soon as such incentives equal 1% of a utility’s peak summer load, which could happen for some utilities as soon as three years from now.
Since then, the bill has been amended by Hershman to take out the “sell all, buy all” system, which makes his focus on it before the committee even more bizarre.
IDEA’s letter ends:
These inaccurate statements by Hershman already have gone viral on social media and may well cause Senate phone lines to further light up this week as a growing number of people learn of them.
We know your committee members want to be as well informed as possible as they work to sort through SB 309, and that they also value their credibility with the public. In that spirit, we implore you to reconvene the committee so this critical misinformation can be brought to light.
The full Senate is expected to vote on the bill on Thursday at the earliest, and the House will take it up sometime after that.
Update: This article was updated at 8:51 am EST on 2/21/17 to reflect that the bill has been amended to take out the “buy all, sell all” provision.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
This bill would force someone to sell ALL their energy from a grid in which they spent their hard-earned money to put up , at wholesale price, and then force them to re-buy it at full retail price. Does that seem at all right? Yeah I didn’t think so. Figure out what if any “extra” cost involved in net metering, add a “net metering maintenance” charge if there is one above the monthly grid charge every customer already pays. That would be fair, not this proposal.
Lisa: On top of the monthly service charge solar owners pay each month, the utilities are benefiting another way financially:
Solar owners make power during the day, when energy is valued higher dollar wise. They send this to the grid (more than what they use) and use it at night where it’s valued lower. But the utilities pocket that difference, they don’t pay it back via credit. So financially, the utilities are not hurting by owners of solar systems. Solar owners are not sending a bill to utilities for service fees on their energy producing equipment and power they are sending to the grid during the day. No additional fees need to be added.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.