California’s controversial Assembly Bill 1139, an act which looked to cut net metering rates paid to rooftop solar customers and remove some benefits for existing solar customers, has been significantly revised by the State Assembly.
The revisions removed a section that would have lowered net metering rates to wholesale electricity rates. That would have worked out to roughly 3 cents per kWh, a drop from the current range of 20+ cents per kWh. The revision also returns the length of time that legacy net metering rates would be given to existing customers to 20 years, instead of 10 years.
The watered-down revision of AB 1139 also gives California’s Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) an extra six months to make its own decision regarding a net metering successor tariff, extending the deadline to August 2022. The initial bill included provisions that would have taken effect had the CPUC not hit a February deadline. Even so, the revised version keeps the provisions intact, regardless of whether regulators meet the deadlines.
This would mean that the bill as it stands would get rid of requirements that the CPUC consider the sustainable growth of the solar industry and distributed energy resources (DERs) when making decisions and that utilities consider the grid cost savings from DERs when making planning decisions.
According to an analysis done by Philip Shen of Roth Capital Partners, the probability of AB 1139’s passage is “low.” Shen said that even if the Assembly passed the bill, the Senate likely would reject. If it were to pass both chambers, Shen said that Gov. Gavin Newsom almost certainly would veto it.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
I just looked up the rates that Southern California Edison pays for residential excess generation and it’s 2.832 cents per kWh for June 2021. Where did the “20+ cents per kWh” come from?
The 2.832 cents is the wholesale reimbursement to consumers applied on the annual ‘true up’ bill IF they’ve generated excess over the year. Otherwise, on a monthly basis with generation credits are balanced against usage during each TOU (time of use) period. The more complex they make it, the better for the utilities.
That makes sense. Thanks
2.832 cents is what you get IF you do not use up all the 20+ credits by true up. What you need to do is USE UP THOSE CREDITS by running electric heaters, electric water heaters rather than running up your natural gas bills. Fill up your Electric Vehicle or plug in hybrid automobile with that 2.832 cent fuel rather than $4 gasoline. The low price is a penalty for not using up all your produced power.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.