Suddenly – some might say surprisingly – President Donald J. Trump has become a man of his word – at least when it comes to slashing from the Department of Energy (DOE) Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 budget any programs that might encourage the solar industry to thrive.
The laundry-list of cuts closely mirrors what Trump previewed in March and what pv magazine reported after a copy of the budget leaked earlier this week. That said, the Trump Administration did hide a few Easter eggs in the appendices, including slashing the budgets of two national laboratories focusing on solar energy research. To wit:
- The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, better known as NREL, would see its overall budget would be slashed 22%, energy-storage research eliminated, and solar energy research cut 22% cut itself.
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory would absorb an overall 28% budget cut. As with NREL, energy-storage research is eliminated, and solar’s research budget would also sustain a nearly fatal reduction of 54%.
As for the other cuts, they included the ones nearly everyone anticipated, including:
- the elimination of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), which nurtures innovative energy technologies that are too early in the development process to garner private-sector investment.
- the elimination of the Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program, which allows companies and projects to take technology risks without the danger of losing their entire investment, is eliminated.
(In fairness, the solar industry has largely outgrown Title 17 program, which means these cuts’ effects will fall more heavily on “advanced nuclear” and “advanced fossil fuel” technologies than renewable energy.)
- the gutting of the budget for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), which funds research into clean-energy technologies. To an untrained observer, the $646 million it receives sounds good – unless it’s compared to its FY 2017 budget, when it received $2.1 billion. For those scoring at home, that’s a nearly 70% decrease.
According to the budget’s fine print, the DOE will fund “federal staff to oversee existing awards to completion and monitor the loan portfolio.” While there is no further explanation of what that means, it does provide hope for some DOE Sunshot Initiative grant winners that they will still get the money they were promised to further their work.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.