A detailed examination of the Texas wholesale electricity market showed wind and solar power generation saved the state approximately $11 billion in 2022. This figure marks a nearly 300% increase from previous years. From 2010 to the end of 2022, wind and solar generation produced $31.5 billion in wholesale electricity savings, benefiting all Texas households.
This value is only expected to grow as wind and solar capacity fill the state’s power grid queue.
The report, led by Dr. Joshua Rhodes and produced by Ideasmiths, projects that expanding wind and solar capacity could save Texans between $6.1 billion and $15.2 billion per yeary, even as the state’s politicians fight tooth and nail against wind and solar project development.
The base calculation for these conclusions hinges on the idea that wind and solar energy, requiring no additional operating costs, induce high-priced power plants to shut down. In 2012, Dr. Rhodes discovered that wind and solar energy (predominantly wind at that time) reduced electricity pricing by just over a tenth of a cent per kWh. By 2022, this reduction had ballooned by 1,700% to over $0.02/kWh.
As a result, electricity pricing in 2022 was 26% lower than anticipated, with a base price of $0.062/kWh versus a projected $0.084/kWh.
From 2018 to 2022, these savings led to an average annual reduction of over $200 in electricity costs for the average Texas household. As wind and solar installation increases, this figure is expected to rise.
The analysis estimates that renewables will save between $21 billion and $43 billion in total from 2023 to 2025, provided that natural gas prices remain between $3.42/MMBTU and $7.34/MMBTU as forecast by the Energy Information Administration. At present, Henry Hub natural gas prices have fallen to near $2/MMBTU.
The report also calculated discrete savings in other areas, including sulfur oxide (SO2), nitrous oxide (NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2), and water (H2O).
Rhodes states that without renewables, fossil fuel burning power plants would have consumed an additional 252 billion gallons of water in a desert-like region often faced with water stress and frequent droughts. At $3 to $7 per thousand gallons of water, this implies savings of $800 million to $1.8 billion.
Adding the societal costs of SO2, NOx, and CO2, (which have a wide range of assigned values), Texans have saved an additional $10 to $77 billion in health and climate costs.
Including the $31 billion-plus in energy savings, it seems possible that Texans may have reaped financial benefits in excess of $100 billion from wind and solar installations since 2010.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
What this article ignores is the value of electric service reliability. While it is true that renewables save fuel and emissions costs, their intermittent nature means that they cannot be relied upon to always provide energy when it is needed. Only energy resources that are dispatchable can do that. Unfortunately, the way that ERCOT is structured, renewable energy may will force the dispatchable resources needed to ensure grid reliability to retire and not be replaced. That will result in periods with cheap energy from renewables along with periods with rolling blackouts.
As the Storm Uri blackouts revealed, not having electricity can be extremely expensive.
Didn’t save Texans anything. It saved the oil companies. Takes vast vast vast quantities of electricity to pump oil up thousands of feet and push it through pipelines.
If it reduced the price of electricity for consumers, it DID save Texans something. Not counting 252,000,000,000 gallons of water, which, I believe, IS something. But facts be damned – let’s keep criticising renewable energy and support climate–wrecking fossil fuels (and yes, Exxon has known they’ve been heating up the climate since at least the 1980’s). Popular Mechanics on their site have an article they published in 1912 that talks about the risks of global heating from burning coal.
I guess some climate–change deniers are a little bit behind the times (like 121 years, in fact!).
Hopefully some of the new industries will impress upon the States regulators to reconsider & evolve their thinking to the future & what is best for all Texans. All resources are precious & need to be protected & managed for the greatest good, including the overall environment & habitats of plants & animals we also value in Texas. 6th generation Texan & voter!
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.