Skip to content

REC Silicon sees 38% sales increase in Q3


REC silicon posted strong financial results for the third quarter, increasing its EBITDA to $3.6 million, up from $1.3 million in the previous quarter. The company cites high sales volumes and improved production costs as the drivers behind this increase.

Sales volume reached 4,091 metric tonnes (MT) for the quarter. 2,835 MT of polysilicon was produced, slightly below guidance of 3,070 MT. REC’s production cost for its fluidized bed reactor (FBR) technology drop to $10.4/kg – 9.6% below the guidance of $11.5/kg.

Stable operations, reduced maintenance and ongoing efforts to increase efficiency are cited as the reason for the improved production costs, and the company appears confident in the low-cost potential of its FBR technology.

Despite the strong quarter, REC is feeling the effects of the continuing trade dispute between the U.S. and China, and recently laid off 30 employees at its U.S. facility in Butte, Montana. The company will continue to operate its Moses Lake polysilicon production facility in Washington Stateat reduced capacity, stating that “FBR production will return to full capacity when the trade dispute is resolved or when market conditions dictate.”

Polysilicon prices increased during the quarter, due to maintenance and other outages limiting supply. The average price outside of China rose to $13/kg outside of China, and $19/kg within.

While REC stated that it “remains focused on identifying sales opportunities outside of China to mitigate the impact of the trade war”, the company is moving forward with plans to tap the more lucrative Chinese market through a joint venture production facility.

REC now expects to bring the first silane gas and FBR production online before the end of the year, and states that it is continuing to negotiate for deferral of the remaining $169 million in capital contributions until after 2018.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.

Welcome to pv magazine USA. This site uses cookies. Read our policy.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.