Solar thermal energy, otherwise called concentrating solar power (CSP), is a renewable energy that uses the heat of the sun collected by various types of focusing mirrors. The energy from the concentrated sunlight heats a high-temperature fluid in a receiver, goes to a heat exchanger and finally drives a steam or gas turbine to produce electricity.
A very promising renewable energy in the noughties, the market for CSP has however failed to really take off in recent years, and while several plants are being built around the world, most notably in China, prices have not come down sufficiently to make it economically viable. Building and maintaining concentrating solar collector fields in harsh, often desertic conditions is too often more expensive than other forms of renewable energy like solar photovoltaic (PV) energy and wind.
Storing energy cheaply
“The competition from solar PV has taken market share away from the more complex solar thermal technology, because the prices of solar panels have come down so much over the last 15 years and they are so easy to install, literally plug and play. Solar thermal however has an important advantage over solar PV: cheap energy storage,” explains Eckhard Lüpfert, the Chair of IEC TC 117, the IEC committee which prepares standards for solar thermal electric plants.
The typical thermal storage systems consist of insulated storage vessels filled with hot molten salt, with pumps and heat exchangers. According to Lüpfert, the price of thermal storage is much cheaper than lithium-ion batteries, which are currently one of the most used forms of energy storage. “The performance of batteries is improving but thermal energy storage has an important edge and is still about a hundred times less expensive,” he states.
An article published in Science Direct stresses that “in areas with a high solar resource, CSP can play a crucial role, thus, significant advances are being made to increase its competitiveness through the improvement of the energy storage systems integrated with CSP”. The paper highlights the potential of CSP thermal energy storage to stabilize the grid by “being able to generate power during hours of high demand (high price periods, morning and evening), and to store energy efficiently, when electricity demand is low, but renewable energy is available in excess (low price periods, midday)”. The idea is for CSP to combine with other renewables such as solar PV and to provide grid-scale energy storage. (To find out more about the different storage systems and technologies used in CSP, read here.)
CSP for industrial process heat
Another selling point for CSP is its use in industries relying on a large amount of energy for heating processes, generally described as industrial process heat. This includes petroleum refining, chemical production, iron and steel, cement, and the food and beverage industries.
To make cement for instance, raw materials such as limestone and clay are ground to a fine powder, which is then heated to a temperature of 1 450 °C in a cement kiln. The heating process relies on energy from fossil fuels, which are huge carbon emitters. Pressure is mounting from all corners for it to decarbonize. While some research is focusing on materials that will require less heating, the concentrated sunlight used to heat transfer fluids in CSP can be employed to provide the high temperatures needed.
CSP can also be used for solar-made fuels, which are drawing increasing interest. (To find out more about this application, read: Understanding solar-made fuels | IEC e-tech).
The absolute need for standards
IEC TC 117 published its first standards in 2017 and has developed key benchmarks for the industry over the last years, all of which are crucial to stabilize the quality of components and installations and to help bring costs down of the various CSP technologies, making them more competitive. Standards also ensure the safety and reliability of CSP systems used around the world. “A CSP plant is not only an electrical installation, it’s almost a chemicals process plant. It deals with hazardous materials, such as organic fluids, which are heated at very high temperatures. Ensuring the safety of workers and the plant’s surrounding environment is therefore of paramount importance and one of the key focuses for our standards,” Lüpfert describes.
Looking towards the future, another area standards will be required for is precisely linked to the use of CSP for niche applications, such as industrial process heat. According to Lüpfert, “We can apply the learnings and achievements of STE plants and apply them to process heat industrial applications. We need to broaden the applications of TC 117 Standards. It is often a matter of scaling down what we have already achieved in terms of performance and reliability.”
One of the main challenges in the coming years will be to attract the right kind of experts to take part in standardization work. “We have many scientists and researchers, but we need more people who are involved on the ground and experts from industry,” Lüpfert indicates.
But there is hope too. “Since COVID, we have changed our ways of working, and meeting online has been a blessing. Thanks to online tools, we have started to attract people who are better qualified for the work we need, notably from the industrial sector. We also use forums like SolarPACES, a technology collaboration platform which enables us to discuss pressing issues relating to CSP, before having the formal constraints of standardization,” he says.
As the race to meet zero carbon emission targets accelerates, concentrating solar power technologies can play an important part in ensuring we get there, with the help of IEC International Standards.
Author: Catherine Bischofberger
The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a global, not-for-profit membership organization that brings together 174 countries and coordinates the work of 30.000 experts globally. IEC International Standards and conformity assessment underpin international trade in electrical and electronic goods. They facilitate electricity access and verify the safety, performance and interoperability of electric and electronic devices and systems, including for example, consumer devices such as mobile phones or refrigerators, office and medical equipment, information technology, electricity generation, and much more.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those held by pv magazine.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
I think the focus of energy storage should be at the end user since most energy is used for heating or cooling and even cooking (higher quality heating). Large hot and cold water tanks in buildings could store hot and cold energies harvested from when the solar heat or electricity is available and then use it later at close to 100% efficiency instead of solar thermal power plants attempting to store extremely hot heat then later convert 33% of it back to electricity only to then send it through an overloaded grid to be converted into heat on an as-needed basis. Yes solar thermal can be done, but there are easier ways to meet the end-use need of producing mild heat (72 degrees Fahrenheit home air heat on demand). Even electric cooking heat could be stored more easily in a stack of hot steel slabs in a well insulated electric oven than ultra high temperature heat stored in a molten salt system then converted at 33% efficiency to electricity then converted to heat for cooking. Concentrating solar heat is great in sunny locations when the end use is heat. Some solar thermal power plants have used water for evaporative cooling of their condenser for their steam cycle. This is in arid, desert locations where the water is a non-renewable resource. This is a huge mistake as is the huge nuclear power plant in Arizona. It has its own irrigation canal. There are massive coal fired power plants in the desert of Western China that don’t use any water at all because they don’t have any. All they have is coal and air and they run a thermal cycle with dry cooling towers. This is less efficient (uses more coal) but at least it doesn’t waste fossil groundwater. Solar thermal could be built on a massive scale storing the heat in the ground where the water table is at least 700 feet down. I would use steam to transfer the heat instead of molten salt. I would probably run the Rankine power cycle on propane instead of water since propane can be more readily condensed at elevated heat rejection temperatures. Now after all that, wouldn’t it be easier to put a photovoltaic panel in the desert and store your evening/night time/morning heat in a hot water heater connected to a fan coil and pump?