The California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) has set a target to reduce emissions to 25 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMT) emissions by 2035, as outlined in the CPUC’s recent document on the 2023 Preferred System Plan and related matters.
This target will guide utilities in choosing electricity sources, with projections for solar power capacity reaching a potential 76.9 GW in a “low gas” scenario by 2035.
The default future projection, known as the 25 MMT Core Case, projects a need for 3 GWac of utility scale solar deployed in 2024, growing to almost 10 GW in 2028, before nearly doubling to 17.9 GW by 2033 and ultimately reaching 57.5 GW in 2045.
This decision marks the culmination of discussions which began in 2020, when it was suggested that previous procurement models were not aggressive enough to meet California’s negative emission goals.
The CPUC also considered additional modeling, including a “0 MMT Core Case” for 2045 and a “Low Gas” model as per requests by stakeholders. The “Low Gas” model proposes accelerating the closure of gas plants beyond the 25 MMT Core Case’s projections, which call for a 70% reduction in gas plant utilization by 2035 and a 90% reduction by 2039, compared to levels in the base year of 2024.
Furthermore, the CPUC urged the state to continue pushing for offshore wind. It contended that transmission upgrades are inevitable, stating that “it was not a matter of if, but rather when, transmission upgrades would be needed” and that these challenges should not impede the work of CPUC staff members mapping the 1.6 GW of potential capacity in waters near the North Coast/Humboldt area.
The state also greatly reduced the projected volume of out-of-state wind available to 52.82 GW of potential capacity.
Utilities were instructed to continue procuring new capacity as if the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant were closing, despite uncertainty about the exact closing dates within the 2024-2025 calendar year. The wide potential closure date range was identified as a potential grid destabilizing event as new capacity was still being deployed and commissioned. The CPUC reiterated the requirement of 2.5 GW of clean resources “designed specifically to mitigate the loss of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant”.
This capacity does not necessarily refer to utility scale power plants, but rather to any capacity for which local electricity utilities contract. For instance, PG&E has signed a contract with residential solar specialist Sunrun for the “Peak Power Rewards” program. This program compensates customers for dispatching power during times of peak demand on the grid. Over 90 consecutive days, 8,500 residential solar-plus-storage assets delivered an average of 27 MW of power during peak hours.
The model included 2 GW of geothermal capacity. One might see a change in this value in the future as Fervos Energy continues its evolution.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Hmmm. Perhaps this information is a bit out of date. Diabo Canyon, California’s last remaining nuclear site, has been asked to continue generating clean, cheap, and safe power until 2030 and has requested a license extension to 2045 or so. Not listing Nuclear in the article seems biased.
Maybe we should talk about the land use requirements here. Isn’t 10 GW about 33,000 acres of additional solar? More?
“PG&E has signed a contract with residential solar specialist Sunrun for the “Peak Power Rewards” program. This program compensates customers for dispatching power during times of peak demand on the grid. Over 90 consecutive days, 8,500 residential solar-plus-storage assets delivered an average of 27 MW of power during peak hours.” What a joke on Residential Rooftop Solar. The CPUC allows PG&E to take 75% away from those who paid a hefty price for the rooftop solar plus overpriced batteries, then says for only 90 days per year they might get compensated for it if they get a “special Contract” from Sunrun. NEM3.0, approved by the CPUC, is killing Residential Rooftop Solar. I had 8,000 watts on my roof with a Tesla Solar Glass Roof and 8,000 watts in my back yard that took 14 years to build and 3 hours of fire to destroy in a fire ignited by illegal fireworks that past 4th of July. Now I am looking to re-build and the arithmetic of higher prices on Solar panels, expensive Batteries and NEM3.0 makes no sense to ever put rooftop solar in ever again. If California ever wants to go green, the citizens need to be rightly compensated for the expenses of doing rooftop solar with batteries. Without rooftop solar, an Electric car or all electric heat exchangers and hot water is also out as well. I have to re-build with Natural Gas since electricity tariffs by PG&E preclude any more electrical load on my home. I predict that Sunrun, Sunpower and Tesla will leave California by filing bankruptcy within the year just like many of the smaller companies have done already in 2023 and 2024 since NEM3.0 became law. There is no future for companies that do not make Off-grid Rooftop solar applications that do not connect to the grid so consumers can have a choice of utility or off grid power. It is time to start buying back-up generators and transfer switches for all the power outages coming when they shut down the last nuclear power plants in California.
The only way I would consider a solar install here in CA is if it isn’t grid-tied. That may even mean hiding my own equipment so that CA and the local monopoly can’t claim a right to search my property for a reason to charge me more.
Either way, Cali “Democrats” are doing the opposite of protecting the environment because they’re too busy protecting the political donations they get from the unions that run PG&E, SDG&E, etc.
There’s no way those installs happen in this environment. Too risky for “incentives” that won’t be there, or that even punish you, as it is today.