The Solar Energy Industries Association has filed a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), regarding a petition asking FERC to end net metering. The petition was filed by a new entity, the New England Ratepayers Association (NERA), with undisclosed members.
SEIA’s filing argues that “issuing the declarations requested by Petitioner would be contrary to the Administrative Procedures Act, an unwarranted departure from Commission precedent, inconsistent with Congressional intent, and an unjustified intrusion into a State’s sovereign authority.” SEIA concludes that FERC “should exercise its discretion to dismiss the Petition.”
Solar United Neighbors, Vote Solar and 16 other groups filed with FERC a legal case against the petition that includes policy arguments in favor of net metering.
SEIA makes three major arguments to dismiss the petition:
- “Petitioners seek to disrupt and overturn states’ rights over retail billing and crediting programs
- Federal law does not preempt state net metering programs
- The authority to establish and administer net metering programs lies with individual states.”
The other filing, from 18 solar, renewable energy, and environmental groups, also called on FERC to reject the petition, “or, in the alternative, deny the Petition on its merits.”
That filing makes the policy case for net metering—presenting evidence of distributed solar’s role in deferring grid investments; noting that net metered customers “often reduce their own loads and system loads during the cost-causing peak hours;” and citing a national laboratory study showing that net metering has small rate impacts, and may reduce retail rates.
As for the “duck curve,” raised as an issue by NERA, the groups’ filing says that issue is “a matter of state resource planning and load management,” and notes that states may include price signals in retail rate design, as with the Massachusetts Clean Peak Energy Standard, and New York’s Value of Distributed Energy Resources program.
On the issue of equity, the groups’ filing states that “the deployment of distributed solar to lower-wealth families can and must be improved,” and adds that net metering is “the most effective mechanism” leading to increased solar deployments, “and therefore lower costs” that will make solar more appealing to low-wealth families.
The filing also argues that net metered solar provides value beyond the wholesale energy market price—both capacity value, “by avoiding otherwise required generation, transmission and distribution capacity,” and ancillary services. The groups included as an appendix to their filing a Rocky Mountain Institute report on the value of distributed solar.
“The value of the costs avoided by distributed generation can approach or exceed the retail rate,” the groups say, before returning to the legal issue: “resource planning and retail rate design” are “appropriately left to the states.”
SEIA’s filing and that of the 18 public interest organizations are available in the FERC docket library, under docket number EL20-42-000.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
As utilities build their own solar and wind farms, the last thing they want is millions of micro systems they can not mark up the energy to maximise profits and have no control of.
In China, were the utilities are government provided and an expense to thecomunist provided system, they welcome micro systems taking the load off the grid. When the system is based on profits, like in the USA, The utilities will discourge homeowners generating their own electricity through lobied legislation. Just look up Micro “on grid” and “off grid” invertes on E-bay, Amazon and Walmart. Most are less than $200.00 and made in China. China has plug and Play on grid and off grid systems all using low voltage battery and solar panel systems.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.