Solar cells and modules incorporating SunPower’s Interdigitated Back Contact (IBC) cell technology have been granted an exemption from the Section 201 duties that the Trump Administration imposed on imported solar products.
The exemption is specifically for IBC cells and modules made from cells that have “more than 100 interdigitated fingers of tin-coated solid copper adhered to the back of the cell, with the copper portion of the metal fingers having a thickness of greater than 0.01 mm”. It was unclear at the time of writing whether or not this would apply to IBC products from LG, which is the only other major PV maker with IBC products.
This exclusion will be effective on September 19, when filed in the Federal Register. According to SunPower this will not be retroactive, meaning that any tariffs paid over the last seven months following the imposition of duties on February 6 will be lost.
SunPower filed for an exemption in March, and this is a major win for a company that has made a number of major sacrifices in a struggle to get to profitability. It also gives SunPower a relative advantage against other suppliers of high-efficiency solar modules to the residential and commercial and industrial markets.
In a press statement, SunPower notes that it is continuing with its planned acquisition of SolarWorld Americas and its factory in Oregon. The company also notes that this transaction is expected to close before the end of the quarter, which means within the next two weeks.
“SunPower can now fully focus our resources to deliver the best solar solutions to our customers, develop the next wave of solar technology through American research and development and invest in American solar manufacturing,” reads a statement by SunPower Chair and CEO Tom Werner. “This will support U.S. solar technology leadership and preserve American jobs.”
In its announcement that it would acquire the factory, SunPower noted the Trump Administration’s interest in retaining U.S. manufacturing. And while product exemptions are supposed to be made on technical grounds and not as quid-pro-quo arrangements, this would not be the first time the Trump Administration eschewed a norm of governance.
The U.S. Trade Representative also included an exemption for modules made from crystalline silicon solar cells manufactured solely in the United States. However as there are no merchant cell providers in the United States and only a two large factories that produce such cells for their own consumption (SolarWorld Americas and the Panasonic/Tesla Gigafactory in Buffalo), it is unclear to whom this would apply.
Update: This article was updated at 2:52 PM on September 18 to clarify the details of the exemption.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
This article implies that the exemption was granted for reasons other than technical grounds, with this paragraph:
“In its announcement that it would acquire the factory, SunPower noted the Trump Administration’s interest in retaining U.S. manufacturing. And while product exemptions are supposed to be made on technical grounds and not as quid-pro-quo arrangements, this would not be the first time the Trump Administration eschewed a norm of governance.”
However, the exemption was only granted to SunPower’s IBC panels, and not their P-series panels which do not use the IBC design.
Therefore I find the quoted paragraph misleading.
You can find it whatever you like. This is pv magazine’s analysis of what is going on here politically.
If I was interested in and all American produced system for the roof of my home could you build an article describing the related products to make it easier for American consumers that want to do right by American manufacturing not necessarily trumps policies which will increase prices/taxes in the end.
Yes, I will start talking to my editor on this article. And I do appreciate your angle on it, as I am trying my best to not be a political loudmouth.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.