A Rhode Island Superior court judge has reversed a zoning board’s decision to approve a 2.9-megawatt solar farm in Portsmouth.
Judge Brian Van Couyghen, citing a previous state Supreme Court decision, delivered his own, arguing “Even though the Board found that the proposed solar farm was similar to a public utility, it would be, in fact, a manufacturing facility because it would transform sunlight into electricity. As stated above, manufacturing is expressly prohibited in residential zones under the Ordinance. As a result, the granting of a special use permit for a manufacturing facility—the solar farm—was clearly erroneous.”
While the decision is under review by the town, this decision sets a puzzling precedent. If the Portsmouth zoning board and the town council accept the judge’s decision, the residential solar market in the town would be effectively killed.
This is worth note, as 3/4 of Rhode Island’s solar production comes from small-scale distributed facilities, according to EIA. Under this ruling, rooftop installations would be prohibited in residential areas because the systems “manufacture” sunlight into energy. There is also the fact that manufacturing is a very strange description of the photovoltaic conversion process, but let’s not get technical.
It is possible that the town will reject the court’s ruling, considering the decision being protested was the town zoning board’s designation of a solar farm as a public utility. The town can and likely will amend the zoning ordinance to allow solar farms in residential areas. The town is also considering petitioning the Rhode Island Supreme Court to review the ruling.
The proposed farm was to be developed by Portsmouth Solar, a local installation company. The town’s initial decision was protested by Roger and Jane Fontaine, residents of Portsmouth who didn’t want thousands of solar panels near their home. Portsmouth Solar said that the company planned to shield the panels from view by planting different vegetation in the area surrounding the panels.
The attorney representing Portsmouth Solar and the town was reached for comment on the ruling, but has not responded as of the time of publication.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
Are other types of power plants treated as manufacturing in RI? I assume they’re treated as public utilities. I don’t see how solar could be treated any differently.
I’m not sure. However, federal law universally treats manufacturing as the processing of physical goods. Therefore I expect this absurd ruling to be overturned.
A back-up generator at home = manufacturing?
Another corrupt ‘judge’.
I presume that decision taken by judiciary on technical issues are based on advise received from Technical bodies ( Technical Institutions/ NGOs/ Power Deptt). If solar farm is manufacturing unit, the battery storage and all other stationery renewable sources are manufacturing units and what is going to happen to move on reduction of Greenhouse gases ,etc
I disagree. This decision does not appear to have been made with any technical advice, as power generation is not manufacturing. It looks like the unprofessional decision of a biased judge in a state with affluent, privileged residents who don’t want to see solar plants in their rural communities.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.