In a rare show of bipartisanship, Democratic Rep. Dan Kildee (Michigan) and Republican Rep. Rob Woodall (Georgia) have filed letters with the U.S. International Trade Commission in support of bankrupt module manufacturer Suniva’s attempts to get “global safeguard” protection from its Chinese competitors.
In other news, water is still wet, and the Pope is still Catholic.
As Suniva inched closer to bankruptcy, it closed its Michigan factory and laid off hundreds from its Atlanta headquarters. The factory was in Kildee’s district, while the headquarters was Woodall’s. In their letter, the Congressmen cite those job losses as reasons the International Trade Commission (ITC) should find in Suniva’s favor.
“American manufacturers like Suniva are unable to fairly compete with their international counterparts,” reads the letter. “As a result, we have experienced the loss of hundreds of jobs in our districts.”
The pair urge Lisa Barton, the secretary of the ITC, make the injury decision “as expeditiously as possible.”
It’s unclear how much influence the Congressmen’s letter will have, but it does comport with the Trump Administration’s support for protectionist trade actions.
It’s undeniable that plunging module prices have created a difficult business climate for module manufacturers around the world. It’s also true that all but two of the Top 10 are Chinese. As margins have shrunk, it has put immense pressure on U.S. manufacturers to compete.
Suniva filed for bankruptcy on April 18 and filed under Sections 201 and 202 of the Trade Act of 1974 with the ITC eight days later. It asks for “global safeguard relief” from imports of crystalline silicon solar PV cells and modules, despite being majority-owned by Shunfeng International Clean Energy, a Chinese company. Naturally, Shunfeng – which also owns Suntech – opposes Suniva’s petition.
Earlier this week, SolarWorld Americas – facing its own financial challenges – joined Suniva’s petition. SolarWorld Americas has also expressed strong support for Trump’s bellicose rhetoric on trade policy.
The petition has been roundly condemned as being potentially disastrous for the U.S. solar industry, with a report by IHS Markit warning that if the petition is successful, it could result in a 60% constriction in the U.S. market by 2021.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
American manufacturers are only asking for a level playing field. The practices of some of our trading partners are very questionable and it is only right the government does something about it.
We as a people can do something about it by buying products made in the USA.
“the government” has already given 35% to 200% import tariffs for chinese solar cells, and these are not “american” manufacturers; they are german and chinese owned.
I can’t locate the petition to sign it if I wanted to. I also found out that even if something is a few more dollars, and is fully made in America then citizens will buy it, because the quality is better, ALWAYS BETTER. Buy cheap and from another country and you will be buying the same product again. Buy all American and you have a product that will last a life time, or won’t kill you. Like toothpaste, cat food, dog food, toys with lead paint.
Imports are bound for the country’s landfills within a year of purchase. Buy American and you have a product that last a lifetime. That is the difference between American products and Chinese. How soon we forget the poison our beloved pets ate, and died. The lead put on the Toys our babies stuffed in their mouths. The anti freeze put our toothpaste. Why are we so forgiven for what our ancestors fought for in safe products in this country. We did not tolerate such actions in this country why do we allow other countries to do the same to us. Shame on the generation of today, and shame on you mothers and fathers who brought you up with no morals.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.