Yesterday afternoon, the U.S. Senate held a procedural vote to advance SJR 8, which “recognized the duty of the federal government to create a Green New Deal”.
That the motion introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) went down in flames at 57-0 is no surprise in the Republican-controlled Senate, and the vote was clearly more about political posturing by the Republican Party than any serious attempt to consider the policy.
But the vote also reinforced one of the central political facts about the Green New Deal: it is doomed not only in the current Republican-led Senate, but is very unlikely to get through the Senate even if Democrats regain a majority in 2020.
Of the four Democrats who voted against the bill, one is Senator Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), who became the ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee (ENRC) after Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) left to become ranking member of the Commerce Committee.
When one party regains a majority in the Senate, the ranking member becomes the chair of the committee. ENRC is the committee that all climate and energy legislation must go through, and under Joe Manchin – who has financial ties to the coal industry and shot a rifle at a climate bill in an ad – it is unlikely that any aggressive clean energy legislation will go through, certainly not anything that puts an end to coal-fired power as this bill would.
A press statement issued by Senator Manchin underscored this point:
While I appreciate the renewed conversation around climate change that the Green New Deal and its supporters have sparked, I think we need to focus on real solutions that recognize the role fossil fuels will continue to play. That’s why I voted against the resolution today.
So while it is notable that the concept of a Green New Deal has wide support among Republican as well as Democratic voters, that does nothing to change Joe Manchin’s position as the gatekeeper of energy legislation in the U.S. Senate; nor does it change a Democratic Party that allowed Manchin to take on this role.
As we at pv magazine have stated before, while this proposal has zero chance at the federal level, efforts to move to high levels of renewable energy are proving much more successful at the state level. This U.S. Senate vote comes only days after New Mexico became the fourth state-level jurisdiction to mandate 100% renewable and/or zero-carbon electricity by 2045/2050, and after Puerto Rico’s House approved a measure to move the island to 100% renewable energy by 2050.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
You neglected to note something very important about the voting record on this bill – almost no Democrats voted for it either! Most just said “Present” when asked for their vocal commitment on the vote. They considered it a “Gotcha” vote because it would definitely be held against them come election time for the general public. It is too radical and expensive to most people’s perception.
I actually think that these extreme ideas are ruining things for those of us who want to promote clean energy such as wind and solar. They are creating a public perception that anything called “Green” will be too expensive. If they persist in forcing radical changes immediately, they will turn the public against any true and good moves toward the goal of reducing our CO2.
This needs to stop being a political rally call to either the Left or the Right. It will die in those battles and will not be properly melded into our society in an orderly way. My thoughts.
Polling data does not agree with your assessment that this idea is too radical. In fact, the link in the article points to a poll wherein the Green New Deal was described to voters, and they overwhelmingly supported it across party lines.
And I think it actually works the opposite way. Most Americans are not so much concerned about a price tag as they are a guarantee that they will not be left behind in the transition to renewable energy, and things like the jobs guarantee and other social measures included in the bill supply that.
Before the Green New Deal, no one had articulated a plan to address climate change that was commensurate with the scope of the problem, so now the ball is in the court of the Republican Party to come up with a serious plan. They haven’t done that yet, and I doubt that they will.
Also, everything in Washington DC is politicized. Trying to blame that on the forces that came up with the first serious plan to address climate change is blaming the wrong actors.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.