In the past few years, the United States has seen a rush of support for solar at the state level. California passed a mandate requiring all new homes to be built with rooftop solar systems as of 2020, while the Massachusetts Senate just approved a bill to remove caps on net metering and set the state on a path to 100% renewable energy.
In the South, however, this wave of solar utilization has been underwhelming and top-heavy. While the South does feature North Carolina, the nation’s 2nd largest solar market, Florida, 8th and Georgia, 10th, the rest of the region is notably lacking in development.
Change could be around the corner, and the results of South Carolina’s primary state elections point to that. While solar has often seen more support in states where the Democratic Party is dominant, what we are now seeing is Republican support due to the economic benefits of solar deployment.
Companies that have seen success in North Carolina are looking at South Carolina to replicate their success, which would bring jobs to the area and help to provide competition to South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) and Duke Energy.
This most recent South Carolina election highlighted a split in the GOP. Nathan Ballentine, Micah Caskey, Randy Ligon, Max Hyde and Bobby Cox, all of which have been identified by Sunrun as pro-solar candidates, won their primaries and will be on the ballot for the South Carolina House of Representatives. Additionally, Rep. Katie Arrington won her race against Rep. Mark Sanford for the Republican nomination for a seat in the U.S. house of representatives. Incumbent Henry McMaster is currently in a runoff in his bid for re-nomination as the GOP candidate for governor.
Much of the drive towards solar can be attributed to the failure of the state’s utilities to deliver competitively-priced electricity. Recently, SCG&E spent $9 billion on a failed nuclear power plant, which is now costing taxpayers across the state $27 per month. The utility’s customers pay an average monthly electric bill of $163, quite possibly the highest in the country.
This combination plays right into the hands of residential solar which, through net metering, allows customers to offset the cost of their consumed electricity through the power which they generate. Therein lies the penultimate issue: in 2018, most utilities aren’t against solar. In fact, South Carolina has a multitude of utility-owned solar projects. However, many utilities are still resisting residential solar because they don’t own it and it cuts into their revenues.
These elections come in the context of political battles over solar policy. Recently, H4421, a bill to remove caps on net metering was defeated due to a technicality in language requiring a 2/3 majority that was not met, although later language raising the caps was inserted into an unrelated bill. Ballentine, Caskey and Arrington all supported the failed bill, with the two former having assisted in drafting it.
South Carolina could well prove to be a pivotal state for the development of the solar industry in the South. If the state is able to prove that the issue is bipartisan and that the economic impact is just as important as the environmental one, it’s neighbors could likely follow suit.
Solar deployment in the South will not look like it has in the Northeast or Southwest. North and South Carolina are the only states in the South with Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) policies, and South Carolina’s is a goal, not a mandate and not binding. That being said, Georgia and Florida have no RPS and are fast-growing solar markets.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
This is great news for our state. Unfortunately, our local state representative, Heather Ammons Crawford in District 68, voted against the solar industry and in favor of the utilities. I wonder why she would vote against jobs? And I know that the 30 employees at our company are concerned about their futures if Ms. Crawford gets her way. It’s funny that I’ve asked her numerous times who benefits from her vote, but never received a response. Weird, isn’t it?
Thanks for your comment! To answer your question, it’s not weird at all when you look at who donates to her campaign. She gets big money from the utilities. This is the only reason why I see she would consistently vote against solar, against fair rates for extra production back to the companies, and against the consumer. It’s a true shame.
I hope you’ll consider supporting my bid for this seat come November. I see the immense NEED and benefit of welcoming and encouraging solar energy in SC.
Thanks for your time – feel free to reach out.
Good article, and I hope South Carolina becomes more solar energy friendly. Ummm… it’s SCE&G, not SCG&E.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.