In many ways California has led the transition to renewable energy in the United States. As the state continues to build more and more solar and modernizes its approach to electricity planning, it has even begun to deny the continuation of contracts to existing gas plants in favor of clean energy alternatives.
California was one of only three states in 2017 to get more than 10% of its power from solar, but has not stopped there. According to an analysis of data from California’s grid operator compiled by pv magazine collaborator and self-described data geek Joe Deely, in May solar generation in the area managed by the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) rose to a new record of 3.02 terawatt-hours (TWh), representing nearly 17% of in-state generation. With local gas generation falling to only 2.67 TWh, or around 15%, this means that solar provided more electricity for Californians than in-state gas for the first time ever on a monthly basis.
It is important to note that as CAISO does not track rooftop solar or other solar generation behind a customer meter, all of the solar projects in the state actually generated as much as 50% more electricity than the CAISO figures show.
But as is usually the case, it is important to look beyond these two sources of generation to get a clear picture of what is going on here. While hydro generation has fallen from its high of 18% last May, it still provided 12% of electricity generation during the month, which is higher than in the drought years of 2014 and 2015.
Over the full course of the year California will likely see a lower level of solar generation, as May is the third-sunniest month. However, the long term trend of solar and other renewables replacing gas is clear. Not only has California been using less gas for electricity generation every year for at least the past four years, but in 2017 the United States saw its first year-over-year decline in gas use since 2013.
The United States has been furiously building gas plants for the first two decades of the 21st century, as cheap gas has beaten out both coal and nuclear power on pure economics. However, when you add to the trends in California and nationally the ability of wind and solar plus battery storage to supply power on demand, it points to a limited future for natural gas as a dominant form of electricity generation.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Nothing is said about the cost of electricity in CA. In Georgia with limited renewable, the average residential cost of electricity is about 11 cents per kilowatt-hour. In CA it is about 19 cents per kilowatt-hour. Georgia has no natural fossil fuel energy resources and has to import all fossil fuels large distances for power generation. CA has natural fossil fuel resources in state and all other within close distances. CA’s high electricity prices is due to renewable being substantially higher than fossil fuel resources.
> CA’s high electricity prices is due to renewable being substantially higher than fossil fuel resources.
You have no evidence of this.
California’s electricity prices were high long before renewables got big. And its because California 15 times more people than Georgia and California actively tries to clean its polluting sources, versus GA who simply spews garbage into the sky.