In many of the rate cases that are being decided throughout the United States, utilities are not getting everything that they ask for, but they are often being granted minor increases to fixed charges which negatively impact the economics of solar.
The recent settlement between utility El Paso Electric (EPE) and solar advocates including Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Energy Freedom Coalition of America (EFCA) approved last Thursday by Texas regulators exemplifies this trend.
Under the settlement, EPE withdrew its proposal for a $15 per month and $3.98 per kilowatt charge its customers to generate electricity behind-the-meter with rooftop solar. However, it was granted increases in its fixed charges for all customers. These will go from $5 to $6.90 per month for residential customers and from $5.95 to $9.95 for small business customers.
EQ Research Policy Research Manager Rusty Haynes calls this outcome “familiar”. “In other U.S. states, regulators have approved either no increase or a modest increase in monthly fixed charges for residential and small business customers,” Haynes told pv magazine. “And where utilities have sought to impose new or higher charges on DG customers, in almost every single case those proposals either were withdrawn as part of a settlement or were rejected by state regulators.”
Additionally, the Public Utilities Commission of Texas (PUCT) allowed a non-fuel based rate increase of $41 million, including $3.7 million for costs related to the Four Corner Generating Station, a massive coal-fired power plant in New Mexico from which EPE has divested its ownership stake. This was less than the $71 million that the utility had asked for.
EPE serves around 300,000 customers in Texas. This order will not affect its customers in New Mexico.
The Alliance for Solar Choice (TASC), which is backed by Sunrun, a party to the settlement, says that the defeat of the demand charge was particularly important. TASC notes that such charges are confusing for residential customers, that the financial impacts on bills are hard to predict, and that they limit the spread of solar PV.
“Consumers want choices and smart rate structures that enable more investment in rooftop solar, and state leaders are largely united in their resolve to reject punitive demand charges and protect a clean energy future,” said Amy Heart, Director of Public Policy for Sunrun and spokesperson for TASC.
Earlier this month EPE announced that it was the first utility in Texas and New Mexico to go coal-free, after selling its 7% stake in the Four Corners Generating Station and letting a 50-year power supply contract expire. The utility notes that it doubled its utility-scale solar commitments in 2014, and will be launching a community solar program next year.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.