The petitioners under the Section 201 trade case, which recently resulted in a serious injury finding by the International Trade Commission, have centered their arguments on U.S. manufacturing. And yet, the U.S. solar manufacturing sector is not solidly behind the Suniva/SolarWorld’s petition. Instead it is strongly opposed by U.S. racking, tracking and mounting systems makers, who say that if Suniva’s proposed trade remedies were enacted it would seriously damage their businesses.
At the recent Solar Power International trade show in Las Vegas pv magazine caught up with Panel Claw CEO Costa Nicolaou, to hear his thoughts on the Section 201 trade case and what it means for his section of manufacturing.
Video courtesy of White Gorilla Media for pv magazine.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.